Prediction of Lauren Davis [190th] vs Kayla Cross [222nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L W L W L
Form
L W W W W W W W W LHead To Head: Davis 1 - 0 Cross
They have played 2 sets in total, with Davis winning 2 and Cross winning 0. The last match between Davis and Cross was at the W75 Vero Beach, 25-01-2025, Quarterfinals, Clay with Lauren Davis getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lauren Davis | 1 |
| Kayla Cross | 0 |
| Davis | Stats | Cross |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (7-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 72% (13-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 190 | Ranking | 222 |
| 26 | Highest Rank | 221 |
| 31 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 10 | Titles | 2 |
| 56% (386-300) | Career Total W/L | 59% (106-73) |
| $2,979,674 | Career Prize Money | $2,835 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lauren Davis vs Kayla Cross Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Davis 1 - 0 Cross
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Davis has won 42.77% of points on their second serve, while Cross has won 40%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Davis, in recent form, has won 46.76% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cross has won 50.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.82% and 31.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Davis has saved 50.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cross has saved 40.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Davis has won 52.17% of matches played (W/L 24/ 22), with Cross winning 65.43% (W/L 53/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Davis has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 35/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 51% (W/L 37/ 36). Cross has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 47/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 18/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Davis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 20/ 10), where as Cross has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.43% of matches (W/L 53/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Davis winning 1 times and Cross being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Davis winning 2 and Cross winning 0. The last match between Davis and Cross was at the W75 Vero Beach, 25-01-2025, Quarterfinals, Clay with Lauren Davis getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Davis and Cross have played a deciding set 0 times, with Davis winning 0 times and Cross 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Davis winning 0, and Cross 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Davis has played against opponents with an average rank of 168.48 while Cross has played against players with an average rank of 163.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Davis has won 73% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cross has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Davis has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cross has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Lauren Davis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Lauren Davis
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Jamie Loeb
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Lauren Davis
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
12
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Aoi Ito
55%
(
64 of
116)
1st Serve %
74%
(
77 of
104)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
26 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
51 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Lauren Davis
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Lauren Davis
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Lauren Davis
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Eva Vedder
83%
(
57 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Ximena Senties
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | |||
view more
Kayla Cross Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Kayla Cross
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Amarni Banks
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Ayana Akli
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Ema Burgic Bucko
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
11
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
21%
(
6 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Fiona Crawley
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
31%
(
10 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
78
|
6-0 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Iva Jovic
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Stefania Rogozinska Dzik
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Eryn Cayetano
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
82%
(
41 of
50)
6
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renata Jamrichova
Player
Kayla Cross
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
80%
(
43 of
54)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Davis vs Cross?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Davis Vs Cross is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (386/300) | Win/Loss | 59% (106/73) |
| 54% (856/741) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (226/173) |
| 51% (7471/7106) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (1897/1713) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 766 | Aces Total | 349 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.5 |
| 1980 | Total Double Faults | 880 |
| 1:26:30 | Average Match Time | 1:30:7 |
| 121.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 185.73 |
| 61% (24664/40506) | 1st Serve % | 61% (6566/10759) |
| 61% (15110/24664) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (4114/6566) |
| 45% (7180/15842) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1867/4193) |
| 48% (2370/4951) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (667/1388) |
| 45% (18401/40867) | Return Points Win % | 46% (5118/11055) |
| 56% (378/672) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (104/172) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 60% (93/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (18/30) |
| 62% (143/230) | Deciding Set Win % | 68% (30/44) |
| 85% (344/293) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (99/90) |
| 15% (344/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (99/8) |
| 27% (341/91) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (80/16) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
